M23 rebels withdraw through the hills having left their position in the
village of Karuba. The group and the government have signed a
declaration to end animosities. AFP
Kinshasa and the leadership of the M23 rebel movement may have
finally signed what was touted as a peace deal in Nairobi, but questions
remain as to whether its provisions will hold.
Besides the looseness in the wording of the
so-called Joint ICGLR-SADC Final Communiqué on the Kampala Dialogue,
there is still deep-seated mistrust between the two protagonists.
In the build-up to the signing of what has been
termed a “declaration” and not a peace agreement (or accord as proposed
by the negotiators), the government of Joseph Kabila has been reluctant
to sign a binding peace deal with the rebel group, especially after the
defeat of the M23 in battle by a UN combat force led by Tanzania, the
Force Intervention Brigade (FIB).
His government has been particularly opposed to
granting of a blanket amnesty to the M23 and its leaders, arguing that
those found culpable should face trial for war crimes and other crimes
against humanity.
A rather public display of division within the
M23, seen in the disjointed surrender of some of its leaders and
fighters, first to Rwandan troops and then to Uganda’s UPDF, only served
to bolster Kabila’s stance and weaken the rebel outfit’s hand in the
talks.
On the other side, a vanquished M23 had ironically
become the biggest advocate of the Kampala peace process, in its
desperation to get something out of its two-year insurgency against
Kinshasa.
Its shopping basket at the talks had blanket amnesty for its fighters and integration into the national army as key demands.
Eventually, at Kenya’s State House in Nairobi,
Kabila appears to have had his way in the document signed by M23’s
political head Bertrand Bisimwa and DRC’s Foreign Affairs Minister
Raymond Tshibandi at a ceremony witnessed by Presidents Uhuru Kenya,
Joseph Kabila, Yoweri Museveni and Joyce Banda.
The latter is the current chair of SADC (Southern
African Development Community), a key sponsor of the talks together with
the ICGLR (International Conference on the Great Lakes Region).
The declaration that was signed states that pardon
will be limited to acts of war and insurgency. This means that those
M23 rebels wanted for war crimes are not likely to benefit from any
amnesty.
This position was confirmed by DRC government
spokesman Lambert Mende, who had earlier told the BBC’s Focus on Africa
radio programme that there will be no amnesty for those wanted for war
crimes.
In July this year, Kinshasa issued international
arrest warrants for four former M23 leaders. DR Congo has accused former
M23 president Jean-Marie Runiga and military commanders Baudouin
Ngaruye, Eric Badege and Innocent Zimurinda of war crimes, crimes
against humanity, torture and other offences.
The four former rebel leaders are close to Bosco
Ntaganda, who is facing charges at the International Criminal Court in
The Hague. Gen Ntaganda was indicted of crimes against humanity
allegedly committed in eastern DRC.
Gen Ntaganda surrendered to the ICC
at the American embassy in Kigali, and asked to be transferred to The
Hague. Kinshasa issued a similar international arrest warrant against
Gen Laurent Nkunda, the former leader of the Tutsi CNDP rebels.
No comments:
Post a Comment