Ethiopia’s prime minister, Meles Zenawi, is an impressive speaker who
has great ideas about African development. Every year he eloquently
welcomes leaders of the African Union (AU) who gather in his country for
the heads of state summits.
The Organisation of African Unity (OAU) was born on May 25 1963, today remembered as Africa Day, in Ethiopia.
Last
month Zenawi also had the rare privilege of playing host to the World
Economic Forum’s Africa meeting, held for the first time in Addis Ababa.
He talks easily about agriculture, intra-African trade and Chinese
state-led capitalism.
Is he perhaps the model of the enlightened African leader who will
ensure the continent’s people are propelled to another level of
development and prosperity?
Ethiopia, one of Africa’s most
populous countries, boasts record growth of between 8% and 11%. It also
has a romantic history that draws starry-eyed tourists to its religious
sites in Lalibela and Gondar and an athletics team that will hopefully
do Africa proud at the London Olympics in July.
Overwhelmed by the poverty
I
thought about this as I looked out of the window from the eighth floor
of my hotel at daybreak one morning earlier this year. No matter what
the growth rates are, you cannot be in Addis Ababa without being
overwhelmed by the poverty of people on the streets.
I stared
with mixed feelings at the inhabitants in ragged clothes starting their
day, emerging from shack-like abodes and struggling along mostly
terrible roads.
Admittedly, scaffolding is everywhere and among
the shacks rise lofty office buildings, many with billboards in Chinese.
But is this really the best place to showcase Africa and house the seat
of the AU?
Everyone knows there is hardly any semblance of
democracy in Ethiopia – journalists and opposition leaders are regularly
jailed and the military is feared across the region.
“You talk
about food; we need freedom!” shouted a protester who slipped through
security at the G8 summit earlier this week while Zenawi was
participating in a debate on stage. The man is seen on a YouTube video
shouting from the back of the hall.
Freedom before food. Why not both?
Popular protest
Last
year, when the domino effect of the Arab Spring raged through North
Africa and heads rolled in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, everyone had a
rethink about where Africa was and where it was going. Could it happen
here, many in sub-Saharan Africa were wondering. For now, apart from a
few quickly suppressed demonstrations on the streets of Kampala and
Luanda, popular protest to force undemocratic leaders to step down has
not taken off.
One of the lessons of the Arab uprisings for
African governments is probably that relative economic prosperity (North
Africa had a far higher human development index than the rest of
sub-Saharan Africa) without political freedom is not sustainable in the
long run – not if people are educated and have access to Al Jazeera.
But
are African leaders in 2012 dedicated to bringing more democracy? Or is
the trend towards Zenawi’s “authoritarian developmentalism”, as Richard
Dowden from the Royal African Society reminds us? Will they do
everything possible to co-opt any opposition into the ruling party and
rely on ethnic, class and other divisions to separate the ruling elite
from a disempowered citizenry?
In many places, civil society and
opposition parties, if they are mature and organised, are increasingly
forcing democracy to happen. In Senegal earlier this year, people tried
to do just that. Although street power did not persuade former president
Abdoulaye Wade not to seek a third term, solid institutions and the
vigilant eye of the media and civil groups fortunately won the day and
Wade lost the election fairly and squarely.
A former senior
researcher at the Institute for Security Studies, Issaka Souaré, has
argued convincingly that the opposition should carry part of the blame
for the lack of proper functioning democracy in Africa. At the same
time, if it was given more credit and a proper place following
elections, one might not see the constant post-election crises.
Insidious danger
People
also hope that the opposition and civil society organisations might
force the elite to share the newly discovered oil wealth in Ghana,
Uganda and Kenya, even though others in Nigeria and Angola have failed
and paid dearly for it.
A more insidious danger is when
opposition to the government is accused of being “unAfrican” and a
lackey of the West – ask Zimbabwe’s Morgan Tsvangirai – though one could
argue that this is largely a phenomenon of the relatively newly
independent states in Southern Africa.
Elsewhere in Africa,
where people have been independent for more than half a century, access
to economic opportunity is the main, overarching issue in people’s
minds. Unfortunately, politics is still the only game in town and the
president is still the richest man in the country.
Yet, when
looking at Africa since the formation of the OAU, a near-impossible task
in such a vast and diverse continent, one is bound to get excited about
the huge opportunities, the aeroplane loads of men in suits flying to
Lusaka or Dar es Salaam doing business and growing the middle class.
Figures show the unprecedented population growth in Africa – in 2050 the
working population here will be larger than in China or India – can be a
huge benefit to countries with the correct structures in place.
But
in some places the thin veneer of an elite – intellectual, political
and economic – masks a deeply dysfunctional state in which things can
easily fall apart. People in rural Senegal or Chad, or in the forests in
Central Africa, are condemned to archaic practices and subsistence
farming to make ends meet. The state is largely absent, but there are no
service delivery protests there.
Cruel consequence
These
are the places where Africa tests our faith in humanity. It is the
eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, still our heart of darkness,
where women are gang-raped and children work in dangerous artisanal
mines; it is the wars in the two Sudans; it is terror by the extremist
Boko Haram in Northern Nigeria.
Will governments, the
international community, the AU and regional organisations be able to
stop dire conflicts with huge humanitarian costs, such as those in
Somalia or the Sahel?
The dramatic coup in Mali on March 22 this
year by soldiers who protested at not having the means to fight a
rebellion in the north of the country was a reminder of this fragile
state. The cruel consequence of the coup is that Mali is now divided in
half. The United Nations estimates that a half-million people have fled
their homes there. These are people who already have so little. For all
former president Thabo Mbeki’s romanticism over Timbuktu and its
scrolls, it is a poor place, surrounded by the vast desert.
But
as the Free University of Amsterdam’s Stephen Ellis says in his
optimistic work Before the Rain, despite the breakdown of the state
people can still thrive through alternative structures. “Even when an
efficient state bureaucracy is absent, power hierarchy and even
institutions may still exist.”
The rapid modernisation of African
cities, freeing up the electronic media and the wide availability of
smartphones is already changing the face of a continent.
There is
much to celebrate on Africa Day, but Africa’s success will probably be
reached despite the rulers and not because of them.
No comments:
Post a Comment